Zimbabweans and the world have been faced with the continuing saga of Zanu-PF and the two Movement for Democratic Change (MDC) formations in secret negotiations for months. To date they have failed to come up with any agreement for ”power-sharing”. Power-Âsharing to achieve what?
Meanwhile, poor Zimbabweans are suffering from increasing inflation, up from a few hundred thousand percent to 22-million percent since the elections in March and June 2008. The so-called talks seem unable to solve the problems faced by Zimbabwe. It is clear that we are doing the wrong thing: we are trying to share power between two intransigent groups, each interested in a monopoly of power, neither interested in the welfare of the poor of Zimbabwe.
Zanu-PF, in power for the past 28 years, is interested in retaining the levers of patronage, as shown by the ”free gifts” bestowed on its supporters, including free tractors (actual price US$47 000 each), free cars (actual price US$37 000 each), free ploughs, free scotch carts, free food, free groceries and money for youths employed to beat up and even kill political opponents. Whenever any ”freebies” are needed, there is a simple solution: print the money to buy them.
On the other hand, the MDC is focused on a personality — Mugabe. Zimbabwe is in ruins because he remains in power and is single-handedly destroying the country. He is depicted as a tyrant, a dictator, a torturer, a murderer. It is not surprising that with such a Âsingle-minded analysis they cannot come to an agreement with such an individual, whom they definitely do not trust.
Is it not time to recognise that the negotiations pose the wrong questions and therefore are bound to come up with the wrong answers? Even if they came up with some ”agreement”, how long will it last before the sides start accusing each other, with the usual swear words: ”tyrant”, ”dictator”, ”torturers”, ”murderers”, ”corrupt”, ”thieves”, ”sell-outs”, ”imperialist agents” and so on? Will one group start arresting the other (for ”treason”)? Will their so-called ”unity” achieve anything of value?
It would be better if the agreement were centred on some key objectives, and the achievement of them within a specified time frame, so that Zimbabweans can call them to account by measurable indicators.
A few objectives:
Zimbabwe’s pharmaceutical industries should be facilitated to produce all basic drugs so that hospitals and clinics can be properly stocked.
Can we have negotiations that ensure that we poor Zimbabweans get these 10 basic needs? Any transitional government should be made responsible for achieving these goals. As a teacher, I propose giving the new government marks every month for each of the 10 objectives. If it consistently fails, we should sack it. Under the present negotiations, it appears the parties are busy sharing posts and privileges while neglecting their fundamental duties. This is my impression, but perhaps it is the wrong impression because everything is being decided under a veil of secrecy.
Are we being fooled again?
Fay Chung is a former Zimbabwean minister of education